TO CHALLENGE THE CONTRACT
From the point of view of the layman this agreement is the
"iron" instrument, the implementation of the provisions of
which are binding on both parties under the threat of
sanctions and litigation. However, in reality this is not
quite true, because the law provides a certain space for
movement in relation to the challenge contract.
However, this task is complex and even a good lawyer is
often able to contest the contract in court only after
laborious study and correlate the provisions of the Treaty
with a multitude of applicable laws and regulations.
There are several grounds on which it is possible to
challenge the agreement in court. The most simple situation
Ц the rules of the contract clearly do not meet the
standards of the current legislation.
The leases generally cover a period of unscrupulous
organizations and individuals to achieve their goals through
the manipulation of the legal ignorance of the other party
to the contract.
And the word ignorance in this context should not be
understood literally Ц the inconsistency of Treaty with law
can very subtly to settle and masked in the text.
Insignificant, that is void, are fictitious contracts and
contracts only in order to cover up other, real, deal.
With regard to legal entities, whether commercial
organizations or public authorities, will be null and void
the treaties concluded by them exceeding their powers.
Null and void the treaties concluded by incompetent persons,
without the involvement of guardians or capable citizens in
the time of the contract in an incapacitated condition
(drunkenness, some serious illness, etc.).
Fraud, violence and threats Ц all this is a cause for
invalidating a contract. Even contracts signed on a citizen
too unfavorable conditions, because of difficult life
circumstances, can be challenged in court.
To challenge the contract in court within three years from
the date of the contract. Your lawyer will have to provide
the court conclusive evidence of the facts on the basis of
which the contract is disputed by you.
The current practice in court is that judges recognize the
contract void, only in case of complex serious evidence